A student took her Kindle to school one day, only to have it taken away as an unapproved device. The above student was doing nothing more than reading before class–the activity for which the e-reader was made.
In the same school, some students carry–and play with–ipads. They browse the internet on Kindle Fires or watch movies on ipods.
When did reading become a crime? When did books become unapproved devices?
On one level, I get the argument: it is an electronic device. However, the original e-ink readers are nothing more than literary etch-a-sketches. Nobody is watching movies on them or texting on them. They are reading. Because, really, that is the sole purpose of a designated e-reader. It’s the only thing it does well.
By taking away a portable library, I think schools are undermining a great and educational hobby. They are forcing kids to choose between carrying thick books or no books at all. They take away the privacy of shy readers who may not want to be ridiculed for reading certain books (the jock who reads Twilight or the struggling readers whose thin books and juvenilish titles easily peg them as “dumb”). Will these readers simply quit reading if their only other choice is being the butt of a joke?
What says you? Do you feel that designated e-readers should be banned from the classroom? Why or why not? Which factors should be used to determine if individual devices are a hindrance or a benefit?
Teachers, in particular, please pipe up. I’d love to have your experienced wisdom in helping me determine where I stand on the issue.
Curious minds really, really want to know.